Help us fight spam!

Lolis in Games Doesn't Hurt Anyone
By ImJustThatKinky β€’ 6 years ago
β€’  8978  β€’   0 β€’ 26


You may have already read about the censoring in Zanki Zero. Which some people are mad about, while other are praising the decision. The main thing bringing problems to the game releasing state side is the fact that you can spend bedtime with β€œChild” characters. Here’s an example:



Now I’m on the side that believes it shouldn’t have been removed from the game. And I truly don’t get why people are so hell bent about getting something like this removed. You don’t have to do the bedtime event with the β€œChild” characters, so why are you so bothered by it? Is it because if it’s not removed from the game, you’d be tempted to look at it! That sounds like a personal problem. You pedo! We seem to worry about the safety of fictional little girls more than real ones nowadays.


People still can’t grasp the difference between fantasy and reality. If the world was reverse, where lolis were okay but violence wasn't’, we would be getting censored GTA. All guns are now nerf guns or paintball guns, and all characters have invisible boxes around them so you can’t run them over. That would fucking suck wouldn’t it!


And before you hit me up with the β€œyou’re only defending it cause you like that loli crap!”. First of all bitch! (I’m not calling everyone a bitch, only the people who think I’m a pedophile.) I don’t even like loli shit. I don’t remember when I ever searched through the loli tag to find my doujin. Yeah, if it’s in my doujin I don’t care, but it’s never something I’ll go looking for.



I’ve seen some people in the comments saying to remove this. If you don’t like it, why did you click on it in the first place? Did give it a read before you made that comment? Hm...very suspicious. It has 268 favorites and 58 likes, so someone must be enjoying it.


If players can avoid the content, should it still be removed? Why do people click on things that they don’t like? Do you ever use the loli tag? Tell us in the comments below.



---------------- 6 years ago
Fuck bans. Characters are not people, they are fictional constructs created for the purpose of personal enjoyment. The sort of people who argue against them either use the slippery slope fallacy or else just want to enforce their own moral standards on the general public. "As it harms none, do as thou will," should be the rule of things. The moment it crosses into IRL, THEN you can get angry.
Anon - Moralguardians 6 years ago
A ban sounds good in theory like everything else. Until you realize that the people doing so are not just saying people are committing wrong think over fiction but that ban would be widespread and horribly mismanaged and characters like Rachel Alucard from Blazblue, all the Pokemon girls, Weiss from RWBY, etc would all get banned. It becomes a question of who should have the right to be the judges
exodusee7 5 years ago
All art can draw out feelings and emotions as well as a physical response. Most of the people on this site definitely read the doujins because they do get a sexual arousal from them. So just because loli characters aren't real doesn't change the fact that they ARE supposed to be prepubescent kids. So it is still disgusting to draw them in a sexual manner, and it should be banned.
Anon - Alita 5 years ago
To other censorers: This ain’t real, chief.
Anon - chise 5 years ago
fact: it aint real
Hectotane 6 years ago
We're not saying that "depictions of children being sexualized" hurts anybody. We're saying that that's all they'll ever do.

"Turning kids into fuck toys" is an easy route for those who refuse difficulty, and henceforth to be taken seriously by the rest of us.
Anon - ko 2 years ago
xr
Anon - anon 5 years ago
Censorship in general sucks, Already looking at a drawing why ya gotta pixilate their childpuss?
Anon - Truth 5 years ago
Fuckin pedos trying to be there sick desires.